Individuals should welcome pointless competition

Policies, for its coercive power, should do their best to avoid pointless competition, but it is not the duty of individuals.

This may turn out to be an example of Poe’s law. In fact I have no idea whether or not it is sarcasm.

1. Competition is one-size-fits-all. Otherwise you should be Ramanujan to succeed.

2. Competition is a social code. It is the choice of relatively inspiring people who tend to wall themselves off in the current climate.

3. Competition is an avoidance of amateurism. Just because amateur projects look serious does not mean they are serious.

4. If you are inactive, you just accelerate climate change.

Competition is a positive inaction. Languor ruins inaction.